Why? As a rule, sequels and even prequels tend to build upon existing audiences, no matter the downgrade in quality. It’s important to note that it made the bulk of its money overseas, like many of the recent Pixar films. narrowly surpassed its predecessor by raking in $743.5 million worldwide ($760 million adjusted for inflation). How much it made: This 2013 prequel to Monsters Inc. Families and young adults came out to this film in droves, and it didn’t hurt that audiences were still enamored with the success of Finding Nemo. Why? One of the main advantages of mashing up several genres like superheroes, family drama, comedy, animation, and spies is that you can generate a ton of interest in your movie. The Incredibles made a whopping $631.million worldwide in 2004, which is actually $795.8 million by today’s standards. ![]() How much it made: Following the success of Finding Nemo was an impossible task, so leave it to the superhero film to accomplish just that. ![]() That, and this was also the first Pixar film to reap the benefits of 3D ticket prices. It also benefitted from a strong opening that had critics raving over the score and memorable characters. Why? The film had broad international appeal thanks to its setting, and it came at a time when Pixar was hitting its stride with back-to-back hits. Adjusted from 2009, that’s over $812 million. Up pulled in an impressive $731 million worldwide. How much it made: It didn’t just collect Oscars. Strong word-of-mouth, the return of the original cast, and an emotionally wrenching premise made this a can’t-miss film for the countless people who fell in love with Toy Story over the course of 15 years. Why? Waiting a decade to finish the franchise was a smart decision on Pixar’s part. It was the first Pixar film to make $1 billion worldwide ($1.1 billion adjusted for inflation), and unlike Finding Nemo, its gap between money made domestically and foreign is much narrower. How much it made: The possibly final entry in the Toy Story franchise is also its most successful. While movies about toys, superheroes, and balloon houses are fun concepts, many people of different ages found a reason to check out this film about a father finding his lost son in an endless ocean. Put simply, Finding Nemo benefitted from having extremely wide appeal. In fact, I’d argue that it opened the floodgates to how well U.S. This was before foreign markets were becoming the brunt of Disney Pixar’s audience. Why? This is pretty impressive considering the fact that Finding Nemo had fewer advantages than more recent Pixar films. But when you adjust for inflation, the underwater animated film actually made $1.2 billion worldwide, easily surpassing the threequel. In 2003, Finding Nemo just barely came short of the billion mark with $936 million made worldwide. ![]() How much it made: Many assume that Toy Story 3 was the first Pixar film to make over $1 billion worldwide, and they’re technically right. Instead, I kept it simple and only pointed out how much money the film made overall. I did not rank these in order of profitability, as in I don’t point out how much it cost to make the film versus how much it made. ![]() I also adjusted everything according to inflation in 2014, so you’re really seeing which films made the most value in their day. To crunch the numbers, I added the domestic and foreign totals to provide the worldwide figures. So for the sake of this post, I’m pointing out how successful each one was compared to the other. Of course, I could easily tell you what my favorite films are and rank them, but how does that really help anyone?Įveryone has their favorites, but everyone also loves lists and comparisons. Trying to compare the Pixar films according to quality and personal affection is a pointless task, in my opinion.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |